Categories:
The CFPB initiated a public inquiry on junk fees, which resulted in tens of thousands of people sharing their stories and complaints about unnecessary and potentially illegal fees. Here are a few of the many published articles: āFighting Junk Fees,ā āThe CFPB is Cleaning Up Junk Fees,ā and āConsumer Bureau Proposes Overdraft Fee Limits for Large Banks.ā The CFPBās primary goal is protecting consumers from being harmed by financial institutions (FIs) taking advantage of low to moderate-income individuals. However, Rohit Chopra zeroed in on overdrafts, a resource that is helpful to many consumers, labeling them āJunk Fees,ā igniting a war on overdraft protection, fees, and NSF fees.
In 2023, CFPB pounded opinion pieces on the āharmfulā fees that FIs charge to generate revenue. Data from the āMaking Ends Meetā report reviewed 2,136 consumers and found that many American families were unprepared for delinquencies. The report only looked at 2,136 individuals out of the 107.9 million households that are ābankedā in America. Reviewing such a small sample group makes the data statistically insignificant. However, the report pointed out an important factāAmericans struggle to make ends meet.
While this is not news to most Americans, it was new information to the CFPB. So, following the data collection, the CFPB dug into all banking fees, believing that banks were using fees to profit off the misfortune of their account holders.
The CFPB, in a proactive stance, followed up this white paper with another, making bold claims with the head-turning title āJunk Fees Updated- Special Edition.ā They targeted unfair NSF fees, re-presented items, and overdraft fees on items authorized positive settle negative. They did not stop there. To put more fuel on the fire, they followed up with three more white papers- āConsent Order Against Bank of America,ā āCircular on āUnanticipated Feesā,ā and āOverdraft/NFS Fee Reliance.ā All focused on how the fees FIs are charging their consumers are āunfair,ā āpredatory,ā āunwelcome,ā and āunnecessary.ā The CFPBās main concern seems to be that banks and credit unions are using fees to create revenue, and FIs shouldnāt be able to make so much money from fees.
The CFPB analyzed 425 banksā annual fee data from 2015-2019. They also studied a smaller group of 238 banks for quarterly analysis. Interestingly, these two groups represented 97.2% of fees assessed in 2015 and 90.7% in 2019. The study showed that the āBig Three in National Banking,ā JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Bank of America, profited from fees with little consideration for compliant, disclosed programs and for charging for re-presentments and AP/SN transactions. After reviewing these three colossal FIs, the CFPB extrapolated that all FIs were using fees to turn a profit- instead of offering these programs to help their consumers.
The CFPB proposed rule is just one of the CFPB’s multi-front agendas to āprotectā consumers from āunlawfulā NSF and other āJunk fees.ā In January 2024, the CFPB shook up the industry by announcing a game-changingāpossibly game-endingārule regulating overdraft fees. The CFPB proposed that FIs should only charge fees based on the cost of the service to the Financial Institution. They suggested four fees: $3, $6, $7, and $14. Many FIs panicked and focused on the proposed $3 fee.
The CFPB did not just pull these numbers out of thin air. the numbers actually came from data provided by FIs with over $10B in assets, ignoring the over 4,000 community-sized banks in America. The calculation divided charge-off losses by the number of non-Reg Z overdraft transactions paid and returned. The CFPB then added $1 per transaction for ācost of funds and operational costs.ā The analysis provided four numbers: $3 and $6 for FIs with the lowest losses and $7 and $14 for the FIs with the highest losses. Now that we better understand where these numbers come from, letās dive into the uncertainty they cause.
No, we are confident that overdraft programs will not disappear. Some FIs considering a $3 overdraft fee think, āWe canāt afford to operate at $3, we should stop providing overdraft to our consumers” While this view is understandable, these fears can be overcome with expert guidance in overdraft protection. Taking away the protection of a compliant overdraft program will send consumers into the arms of payday lenders, which is something all community FIs want to avoid.
āA government price cap on overdraft will not decrease the price of this product, but instead lead banks not to offer the product at all. If the proposal is finalized, the Bureau will deprive customers of a critical source of short-term liquidity, leading them to turn to expensive nonbank providers.ā
ā Iowa Bankers Association
āThe CFPB contends that consumers will significantly benefit from this proposed rule; however, evidence suggests otherwise, as consumers actively choose to enroll in overdraft programs even after receiving comprehensive, transparent, and meaningful written program disclosures. Additionally, contrary to the CFPBās portrayal, overdraft fees are not deemed unfair or deceptive, nor should they be labeled as āJunk Fees.āā
– Nevada and California Credit Unions
Our clients approach overdraft as a service to consumers, one that is fully compliant and disclosed. Most community FIs want to keep their account holders from turning to other options such as payday lenders or incurring other fees.
When Susan checks her bank account and sees she is short on funds, but her rent is due, she knows she has the safety net of overdraft privilege. She can choose to pay an overdraft fee rather than risk a late payment. This convenient option helps her avoid potential consequences like credit damage and additional fees. By having access to a transparent overdraft service in place, Susan is saved from facing harsh repercussions.
It should not be surprising to read that the CFPBās crackdown on āJunk Feesā has ignited a heated debate across all FIs. While they mean well and aim to protect consumers, their broad approach raises many concerns about how it will impact FIs and consumers. Having a better understanding of where the CFPB is coming from can help FIs better strategize their response to the ruling. When partnering with an expert in the overdraft protection realm, FIs can gain guidance on navigating the complex world of overdraft fees. Staying ahead of the ruling and being in front of the curve can help keep your FI consumer-centric and help you slowly move away from relying solely on overdraft fees for revenue.
For more on this topic, check out our webinar, “The most effective ways to preserve income and mitigate risk exposure.“
About ADVANTAGE, powered by JMFA
ADVANTAGE is a leading provider of consultation services for credit unions and community banks. With a long-standing 40-year history of excellence, we help our clients navigate the ever-changing financial landscape, providing solutions that give them a competitive advantage. Our services include account acquisition, overdraft compliance consulting, contract negotiation, and technology strategy and selection. From growing market share and improving non-interest income to contract negotiations and technology strategy, our experts offer you and your account holders the best solutions.
To subscribe to our news and updates, visit advantage-fi.com/newsletter.