Redefining Overdraft Protection in Community Financial Institutions
Categories:
Overdraft protection is a contentious topic for most community bank and credit union leaders, and rightfully so. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau’s (CFPB) scrutiny of overdraft programs has become a constant presence in this year’s events and meetings, both on the agenda and in the hallways. As we all eagerly await the CFPB ruling on overdraft fees, they face the complex task of balancing regulatory expectations, consumer needs, market competition, and the realities of service-based noninterest income.
The Regulatory Scrutiny
All regulators have increased their focus on overdraft protection. These entities are most concerned by financial institutions relying on overdraft fees as an income stream.
The CFPB has stated that to be exempt from the proposed rule, the fee must be tied directly to the cost of offering a “service”—the final rule may contain a benchmark fee as low as $3. The proposed rule reclassifies overdraft programs as a loan product subjected to Reg. Z.
However, the CFPB fails to note that the average overdraft fee is already declining. According to the findings of Bankrate’s research last August, the average overdraft fee had dropped to $26.61, marking an 11% decrease from their 2022 study.
The scrutiny of overdraft services is at an all-time high. It’s a regulatory focus that demands immediate action. Banks and credit unions must re-evaluate their overdraft programs to align with the rapidly changing landscape.
The Time to Act is Now
John Cohron emphasizes the need to not only maintain their overdraft programs but also to evaluate and enhance them to meet regulatory standards.
“Community banks and credit unions must introduce alternatives to overdraft fees, such as transfers from savings accounts and lines of credit, and implementing fee caps to protect consumers from excessive charges.”
John Cohron, CEO at ADVANTAGE
Consumer Needs and Expectations
When examining overdraft programs, their intended purpose is often forgotten. It is not simply a way for financial institutions to generate more revenue but to provide a financial safety net. Consumers value overdraft services for the financial flexibility they provide, often expressing appreciation for the coverage during shortfalls. Overdraft fees are often less than a late fee on rent or a penalty fee plus interest for paying a bill late. Paying an overdraft fee over a late fee can save them hundreds of dollars. However, it’s crucial to ensure that these services are transparent, putting consumers first.
Jennifer Simmons, VP of National Alliances at ADVANTAGE, underscores the importance of account holders fully understanding their options and having confidence in the timing of payments.
“Financial institutions can enhance the consumer experience by offering low-balance alerts, grace periods, and clearly communicating alternatives to overdraft fees. This proactive approach fosters trust and helps account holders manage their finances more effectively. Overdraft programs should be a safety net, not a penalty.”
Jennifer Simmons, VP of National Alliances at ADVANTAGE
This highlights the need for financial institutions to provide clear and comprehensive information about their overdraft programs and any potential alternatives.
The Overdraft Fee Dilemma
No one likes paying fees, but sometimes, they are necessary or unavoidable. It’s hard to ignore the fact that overdraft fees represent a significant non-interest income stream for many financial institutions, and regulatory expectations coupled with market pressure threaten this income. The challenge lies in adapting fee strategies without compromising financial stability. No one is suggesting that overdraft fees should completely go away. However, the best response is to evaluate and adopt market-based fees, ensuring they remain competitive while aligning with industry standards.
A critical aspect of this adaptation is addressing the issue of excessive fees for those who frequently use overdraft services. Rather than removing the service, which could push them toward payday lenders, financial institutions should be offering additional options, including financial counseling, debt consolidation loans, and budgeting assistance. This holistic approach helps account holders manage their finances and reduce their dependence on overdraft services.
Technological Advancements
Technology plays a crucial role in modernizing overdraft programs. A more modernized payment system can enhance the efficiency and transparency of these services. For instance, digital solutions can provide real-time alerts and notifications so account holders can more easily be informed about their account status and avoid overdraft situations.
Technology investment allows financial institutions to stay competitive and meet evolving consumer expectations. As the market becomes more saturated with financial technology options, offering seamless, consumer-friendly overdraft solutions becomes increasingly important.
Compliance and Risk Mitigation
Compliance is the cornerstone of effective banking and the foundation of overdraft program management. Overdraft programs must adhere to regulatory guidelines, such as those addressing multiple re-presentments and authorized positive, settle negative (APSN) transactions.
“Keeping core systems and processes current to reflect regulatory requirements and best practices must be a top priority.”
Cheryl Lawson, EVP of Compliance Review at ADVANTAGE
Clear, compliant disclosures are essential for regulatory adherence and overall consumer understanding. It is important to address these compliance issues to mitigate the risk of regulatory penalties and class action lawsuits.
CFPB’s Benchmark Overdraft Fee Options
The CFPB’s introduction of benchmark overdraft fee options—$3, $6, $7, and $14—has unsurprisingly raised questions within the industry. These benchmarks are intended as a guide, allowing financial institutions to adopt either one option or create their own based on defensible data. These benchmarks are not an end-all-be-all for overdraft fees.
As John Cohron explains, “The CFPB’s data is based on over a decade-old information from large, undisclosed overdraft providers. This data does not reflect the current environment or the transparent, consumer-focused solutions that many of the financial institutions we partner with offer.” Furthermore, these benchmarks may not apply to smaller financial institutions. “Maybe if you’re a bank that’s got 600 million account holders, its overdraft fees can cost three dollars, but not for every size institution,” Cohron notes.
He emphasizes the need for community banks and credit unions to leverage their current data to create benchmarks that accurately reflect operational costs and account holder needs.
While the majority of financial institutions will not be directly impacted by the CFPB’s final rule, they should remain mindful of market trends to keep the program and fees competitive. Regardless of the final rule, community financial institutions may still have to justify their program to examiners, ensuring they are up to regulatory standards and are providing a valuable service to those consumers who want it.
The Role of Examiners
Overall, examiners are focused on monitoring overdraft programs for practices perceived as unfair or deceptive, including scrutiny of website advertising, balance calculation methods, and settlement processes. Additionally, some examiners are expanding their focus to NSF (Non-Sufficient Funds) and overdraft (OD) fees as potential concentration risks. These evolving expectations underscore the importance for financial institutions to continually evaluate their programs to ensure they are consumer-centric and compliant with regulatory guidance.
Financial institutions should prioritize providing transparent disclosures, effectively managing negative accounts, and helping account holders understand how overdrafts are handled, what options they have, and how to avoid overdraft situations. Meeting these expectations not only aligns with regulatory standards but also fosters trust and satisfaction among account holders.
Conclusion
Overdraft protection is a multifaceted issue that requires balancing regulatory demands, consumer needs, and financial realities. Adopting a consumer-centric approach, leveraging technology, and maintaining compliance leads to effectively navigating this challenging landscape. The key lies in evolving overdraft practices to be fair, transparent, and supportive of consumers’ financial health, ensuring these services continue to provide value in a changing regulatory environment.
As the industry engages in discussions prompted by the CFPB’s proposals, it’s clear that stronger households create stronger communities and, by extension, stronger financial institutions. The goal is to keep consumers out of predatory lending situations and provide them with reliable, transparent financial solutions.
For more on this topic, check out our webinar, “Overdraft Overhaul: Insights into the CFPB’s Game-Changing Proposal“
Contact your local representative to learn more about what we offer or how to receive a complimentary evaluation.
About ADVANTAGE, powered by JMFA
ADVANTAGE is a leading provider of consultation services for credit unions and community banks. With a long-standing 40-year history of excellence, we help our clients navigate the ever-changing financial landscape, providing solutions that give them a competitive advantage. Our services include account acquisition, overdraft compliance consulting, contract negotiation, and technology strategy and selection. From growing market share and improving non-interest income to contract negotiations and technology strategy, our experts offer you and your account holders the best solutions.
To subscribe to our news and updates, visit advantage-fi.com/newsletter.
